Skip to main content
AI products and research

Building at the frontier of agentic AI

We build AI products and publish what we learn along the way. Research, tools, and open knowledge from the cutting edge.

What we're exploring

Our research focus

We build products and conduct research across several areas of agentic AI. Here's what we're working on.

Autonomous Agents

Agents that reason, plan, and execute multi-step tasks with minimal human oversight. We study how to make them reliable enough for production.

Multi-Agent Orchestration

Coordinating teams of specialized AI agents that collaborate, debate, and synthesize — the architecture behind Kapwa's Symphony Mode.

Long-Horizon Research

Deep research agents that work over days and weeks, building on their own findings to produce continuously evolving analysis.

Applied AI Engineering

Turning research into shipped products. Streaming architectures, semantic memory, tool use, and the engineering that makes AI systems work.

Interactive Tool

See agentic AI analysis
in action

Describe any work or business scenario and get a complete build-vs-buy analysis — custom agent architectures, off-the-shelf product recommendations, and a practical comparison to help you decide.

Try the AI Strategy Analyzer

Our Products

What we build

AI products and custom agents, from a multi-persona advisory board to agents built for a single domain or person.

Live

Analyzer

Real-time AI strategy analysis: architecture diagrams, opportunity maps, and implementation roadmaps, powered by agentic reasoning.

Try the Analyzer
Live

Kapwa

An AI advisory board where you consult hundreds of specialized personas for multi-perspective conversations, powered by ensemble AI orchestration.

Learn how it works
Building

Custom agents

Health and personal-finance agents, highly customized to each person's goals and preferences.

Learn more
Upcoming

Everyday Filipino

A Filipino language learning tool for families.

Learn more

What's next

Long-horizon deep research

We're building a research agent that doesn't stop after one answer. It produces a report, then continues working — running deeper analysis, finding new connections, and updating its findings daily. Research that compounds over time.

Continuous research reports

Imagine a research report that updates itself. The agent performs an initial deep dive, delivers findings, then keeps working in the background — running increasingly complex analyses that build on previous results. Each day, the report gets deeper and more nuanced.

Multi-day executionCompounding analysisSelf-directed researchEvolving reports

Reading List

What we're reading

Weekly Gen AI headlines for builders, plus the papers that define the field.

This Week

Satya Nadella calls for an AI 'emergency brake' to rethink model trust architecture

Microsoft's CEO urging a pause to assess AI trust architecture signals safety expectations may tighten — factor guardrails and eval infrastructure into your roadmap now.

2026

3D-Layout-R1: Structured Reasoning for Language-Instructed Spatial Editing

This paper addresses the limitation of large language and vision-language models in maintaining spatial consistency during fine-grained visual editing by introducing a structured reasoning framework that operates over scene graphs. By reformulating text-conditioned spatial editing as explicit graph reasoning rather than end-to-end generation, the method enables precise manipulation of object layouts through natural language instructions while preserving geometric coherence. The work establishes structured scene-graph reasoning as a necessary intermediate representation for bridging high-level linguistic commands with geometrically consistent spatial editing in 3D environments.

2026

A Mechanistic View on Video Generation as World Models: State and Dynamics

Decomposes video world models into two pillars: state construction (implicit — context in transformer activations, vs explicit — compressed latent tokens or 3D scene statistics) and dynamics modeling (how models integrate physical knowledge and architectural priors). Argues evaluation must shift from visual fidelity to functional benchmarks: physical persistence, causal reasoning, and task-supportable dynamics. Identifies two frontier challenges — persistence and causality.